Is it true that there's nothing wrong with commodification that fair terms of social cooperation cannot cure?
Let’s identify the potential horror lurking in the proprietary relationships that some fans imagine they enjoy with celebrities.
Pain and grief are among our most private, isolating experiences.
Those committed to human rights at the global level should seek not to universalize the particular but rather to particularize the universal.
For the people to be sovereign, they need to form an entity and have a personality.
Rare are intellectuals who both achieve a leading status in their field and relentlessly pursue knowledge that seeks to better the lives of ordinary people. Amartya Sen is one.
Elster’s analysis is not another interpretative rereading or even a systematic dissection.
The Madoff family wielded remarkable power in the financial world and was not reluctant to use that power to reward friends and punish enemies. In such a world, silence becomes judicious prudence.
Traders, like gaming designers, manipulate bodies, machines, and mental states to promote peak experience.
The history of economics has been a battle of ideas, and it is unclear that the best ideas have been the winners.
We have too few occasions to do anything because of a certain pre-determination of things from afar.
Autonomy becomes necessity when efficiency is the universal measure.
There are certain kinds of work that thwart the logic of remote control.
We know very little about what we are doing, why we do it, or how we feel about it.
Analyses of ghostwritten articles shows them to both exaggerate effectiveness and downplay adverse effects.
The author’s interpretive framework truncates the narrative by forcing her to see thick cultural issues only through the lens of social class.
What is a Catholic philosopher?
The civic and practical goals of humanistic learning are necessarily related to the project of human autonomy, for there can be no autonomy apart from the provisos and attributes of self-knowledge.
In a world filled with mobile people—economic immigrants and political exiles in particular—an old humanist ideal might help us to give shape to our lives.
If the clever human life form were to project its power in the form of technologically advanced, artificial offspring, would Nietzsche offer a principled objection, and if so, what would be its basis?
The unscientific foundation of science and technology is in need of wisdom, practical and theoretical, about human ends.
The ideology of the pure gift is not foreign or extraneous to the monetization of relationships.
Like it or not, the basis of human culture has a great deal to do with the evolution of a socio-affective/social-cognitive infrastructure that opens up an enormous arc of possibility.
Can dignity bear the weight we want to give it in our political, legal, and moral systems?
Hoping for a richer, particularistic philosophy of medicine.
The marketplace has infiltrated intimate life and transformed the self.
Capitalism has been a form of enchantment, a metamorphosis of the sacred in the raiment of secularity. With money as its ontological marrow, it represents a moral and metaphysical imagination as well as a sublimation of our desire for the presence of divinity in the everyday world.
Our moral educations should happen at dinner tables, in classrooms, on football fields, in synagogues and churches.
The culture wars have led to a deep sense of loss for most normative Americans.
According to the realists, power is real, and all else is illusion.
Conceding the pathological potential of narcissism, the book affirms that it can also be a “wellspring of human ambition and creativity, values and ideals, empathy and fellow feeling.
There is a long series of instances in which public health agencies have responded to disease outbreaks with dangerous Pollyannaism, seemingly violating their core mission.
Mysteriously, biologically, men and women want, or want to want, “the same thing.”
In the course of becoming a professional, a person is learning to fill a certain role in society.
Because of me, Alex will never realize his potential, never discover the man he might’ve been. I’m deeply sorry for that. And that’s the sort of existential shame I grapple with: Here I am, years later, sober and learning and writing and finding out who I can be, and yet Alex can never do any of those things. Because of me.
The devil was understood to be present and industrious, and America’s earliest forebears were quick to suss him out by his evil works.
Taking a hard look at the smart city requires that we ask not only where it might fail to live up to the promises of its boosters, but also where it is successful and how it might nonetheless still fail us as citizens and as human beings.
Many have suggested that cities should be the vanguard of global governance on issues such as climate, immigration, and terrorism.
Within cities themselves, new wealth has been greeted with great fanfare—except by those who see gentrification as a threat to the communities that remained during the decades of white flight.
Goats, like cats, are closer to nature than most domesticated animals, both species going feral more easily than domesticated dogs, which are rarely able to acclimate to life in the wild.
The complexities of social media ought to prompt deep reflection on what we all owe to the future, and how we might discharge this debt.
The fact is, work as we know it isn’t worth saving anyway.
Uncomfortable though it might be to admit, Heidegger’s thinking is part of the Jewish textual tradition.
Rogan’s book is a welcome step toward uncovering and building up a tradition of alternative economics, one in which economics is not a value-free discipline, but, rather, is shaped by social customs, expectations, and values.
Is Whole Foods a kind of morality tale, a story of what happens when a company that started with good intentions gets too big too fast?
Reconsidering the complex relationship between humans and the wider animal kingdom.
Mary Midgley’s writing was profound but rarely technical; she trained her sights on general problems.
In the long run, we all pay dearly for the carefully crafted commercial illusion that we can hold people to standards on a selective basis.
If we succeed in growing meat, we will do more than change human subsistence strategies forever.
Zagajewski’s poems call us to live more deeply, with both the ugliness and beauty of life, saying “but, just wait…there is more.”
What emerges in the essays in this issue is actually not one secularism, but rather a range of secularisms—French, American, Indian, and other—that can be compared, evaluated, and improved upon.
Social and cultural change, from the rise of the “information economy” to changes in family life to the technological mediation of our relationships, is happening all around us.
There seems to be little agreement on what it is that needs sustaining, let alone how we should go about it in practice.
The successful marketing of the “new science of morality” suggests its considerable allure for the popular imagination.
Untruth—information that could be described as unverified, misleading, or an out-and-out lie—has been spreading with new ease and abandon, and often to undemocratic effect.
Never has food been delivered in such abundance, so far, or so safely.
Distance can breed ignorance of the ecosystems and individual animal lives that feed us.
Food is a strong proof of our animality; it is equally strong evidence of how we transcend it.
We are living through a vertigo in political culture.
We bad-movie watchers have our own anticriteria, the sorts of badness we prefer.
A grotesque and caricatured version of Simone Weil undermines an otherwise good book.
Like a lover of endangered species, the lover of endangered words jumps for joy when he sees a word being rescued.
Gustav Theodor Fechner’s soul neither defies naturalism nor depends on revelation.
Moral growth doesn’t just mean looking to the future but reconciling past and present selfhood. It demands regret.
Quantification is more than merely a means of communication and persuasion in a fragmented culture.
How are we ethically to evaluate the practice of getting stoned?
Modernity needs to be revealed to us, because it so successfully hides its true character, insulating itself against revision and correction.
In the event you needed any further bad news in this year of the coronavirus pandemic, you’ll find it in this piercing, distressing, and shaming account of our tendency to follow the herd.
We need more profanity? Aren’t we already being inundated with it?
Every society in history has limited speech in some way, yet some have remained freer than others.
Far beyond the opera house and the concert hall, we are living in a world Wagner helped make.
Given the gorgeousness of George Eliot’s own prose, her translation’s eloquence comes as no surprise.
In the words of retired Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy, “a people confident in its laws and institutions should not be ashamed of mercy.”
Like the “radical orthodoxy” associated with John Milbank, Stanley Hauerwas, and an array of other British and American theologians, Hart’s project of rejuvenation has been no narrowly theological or academic exercise.
Cancel ’s murkiness has made it a very useful word for pushing already contentious or delicate matters into the realm of total confusion.
We might be murderers, and we might not, but isn’t it safer to assume we are and be proven wrong? Maybe not.
When you bring children into being, you give them the gift of life, but you also impose on them these terrible costs.
On locating the sublimity of art within the world and within history.
The disagreement between modernism and the contemporary discourse of “self-help” is not about whether literature has “therapeutic” capacities.
Privilege today still comes with strings attached, but they are different now.
In any case, trying to use Twitter as a public square is like hiking the Matterhorn at Disneyland. Like the Matterhorn, Twitter is an amusement, not a place for exploration.
Consider embracing utopia at once as indeterminate speculation about a qualitatively better future and as a hypothesis, by assuming it to be possible.
The liberty of the adult citizen depends on the subordination of the prepolitical child.
If the pandemic has taught us anything, it is that the health of the community is essential to the health of the individual.
Putting the cult back into culture in the analysis of politics.
Studying art taught me to think differently about medical procedures.
The mythic bipartisan center was never a matter of niceness.
The eureka moment came when Popper perceived an affinity between Plato and fascism.
Ehrenerklärung—public acknowledgment of false accusations—is not one of the options offered by our social media culture.
Does the loss of confidence in the humanities suggest a problem about knowledge or a problem about value?
Viewing the Anthropocene as “a measure of human impact on the planet” allows us to tell only one story.
Is a feminist movement that speaks straight at me, let alone one whose central goal is to liberate me further, really a good use of anybody’s time?
The challenge of institutional ethics training is not just teaching rules, regulations, and norms—but teaching employees to care.
Rawls tried to avoid metaphysics because he felt that it interfered with his great game.
This project is and always has been worthwhile, even if groups of detractors talk themselves out of it from time to time.
Does anyone still need advice on how not to think like a liberal?
Bellah held the conviction that religious matters were not purely intellectual, much less merely academic.
The only way out of this prison of self-deception and self-justification is to love and seek the truth.
Contending with a radical distrust of the created world.
The practice of exercising judgment requires that very common sense upon which a common world is based.
Amid the social turmoil of postwar Vienna, Othmar Spann’s class auditorium became a political battlefield.
What if the work-week were fifteen hours a week? What if it were zero?
MacIntyre is philosophically an antiliberal, yet he provides no real alternative to liberal democracy.
Costică Brădățan’s argument in praise of failure rests on its ability to make us humble.
Have we actually shifted the cost to those who take outsized risks?
Television is a paradigm that frames all visual communication as entertainment.
Tillich suggested another word—and a curious one—to help interpret sin: estrangement.
COVID made visible the usually subterranean core of the liberal project, which is not merely political but anthropological.
More and more, our lives happen there, on the screens of the bleeping little tyrants in our pockets.
Friedman’s viewpoint went far deeper and has been more lasting than the politics of 1970.
Work is hard in large part because it is a site where people place serious demands on each other. Meeting those demands can be painful.
The greatest challenge presented by modern corporations, small as well as large, involves purpose.
The young will be formed. The question is how.
The histories and literatures of antiquity can help us address some of our contemporary ethical deficit disorder.
The self has never been more securely an object of classification than it is today.
Today, the “college experience” centered on a residential life that promises to envelope students in a warm, intimate community has hardened into something more totalizing than even the blundering late-twentieth-century project of enforcing political correctness.
The growing damage to truthfulness reflects something more—not just a personal discrepancy but a deep social discrepancy as well.
This is why the stories we surround ourselves with and immerse ourselves in matter.
The Claphamites unquestionably launched a revolution in manners that shaped what we have come to know as Victorian morality.
Revisiting Meredith v. Fair, we get the inside story of how critical race theory was developed in the years after Brown.
We would do well to challenge the headlong adoption of predictive medicine.
The costs of a consumerist culture in which obsolescence is a strategy continue to mount.
Measurable impact has crept into everyday understandings of charity.
While focusing on the categories it generates through analysis, science sometimes overlooks those aspects of individuals that cannot easily be summed up in a word.
The regrettable but all-too-common phenomenon of medical personnel “turning a blind eye” to unethical and injurious practices.
Family policy is at the heart of an intense debate about the future of any plausible post-neoliberal governance.
Our inability to switch off our commonsense intuitions will lead us to adopt some odd, half-formed ideologies.
Taste became one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking.
Charlottesville city councilor Kathy Galvin on the challenges of city governance
Cities are increasingly being eyed by tech companies for their social dynamism and ability to generate innovation. This will have tremendous consequences for the future of society.
The virtual dimensions of assembly may yield insights for how we understand more traditional assemblies and the legal protections that we assign to them.
What's the real-world significance of arguing in a New York Times op-ed that life doesn't exist? More than we might initially think.
What happens if we become willing to trade in an understanding of a rich and meaning-laden feature of our nature for, well, something we can share with a rat.
A monkey's selfie has done more than just raise awareness about an endangered species.
Whole Foods Market is tired of your “whole paycheck” jokes. Recently, “America’s healthiest grocery store” launched a multi-million dollar advertising campaign titled Values Matter.
Pantone's Marsala is no mauve, but it does reflect our present cultural mood.
To reduce a museum experience to the laws of supply and demand devalues not only the art itself but also the curators’ years of education and expertise—connoisseurship on which we rely in institutions that position themselves as cultural arbiters.
Meaningful social change requires the kind of social reconciliation that can only emerge through aggregated instances of both forgiveness and repentance.
For the editors of The Economist, euthanasia is "an idea whose time has come."
Francis’s integral ecology challenges some tendencies on both the right and the left.
If we want the Internet to remain free and open for everyone, is it right to exclude bullies and jerks? Lessons from the Ellen Pao incident.
Is the science in social science worth defending? The short answer is yes, and the long answer is that it depends on how you define science.
A translation of English to English presumes that ambiguity of language is always a flaw—but it’s not.
With our colleagues, and with our students, we have the space not only to express disagreement in more than tweets and sound bites, but also to probe the reasons underlying our disagreement.
Is it enough for a business to turn a profit? Or should a business cultivate human flourishing and shared prosperity to be considered a success?
A zero sum reality, in which every win is someone else’s loss, exists in a constant state of crisis.
We can’t take CEOs’ high-flown gestures at face value.
How do we more lastingly move beyond the impasses we have reached on a host of ethical issues at the heart of our highly politicized culture wars?
Our exploitive relationship to the natural order is greatly magnifying the possibility of spillover and increasing virus virulence.
To make promises, to stand by one words, to be answerable for them, is to open oneself to blame.
The point of reopening is not to free voluntary workers but to place more into the category of “mandatory worker.”
A human spirit of community and kindness can be learned. But it can also be forgotten.
Donald Trump’s manner was a declaration of indifference toward the values that make democracy possible.
The gap between our concepts of love and justice has served us poorly.
We need to preserve a distinction between recognizing our transgressions and resolving to change, on one hand, and imagining that we can forgive ourselves, on the other.
Americans have been making arguments about the nature of their unity from the beginning.
Our writing process lacks sufficient resistance, hesitation, reconsideration.
Well known free speech advocates may not always be free speech absolutists.
Henry James’s fiction shows how aesthetic misjudgments can be connected to moral vice.
The question I want to ask is simply this: Is the writing of a Life a game that, in our current moment, can be played?
That means, first, that I have to love my neighbor—my colleague—above my own productivity.
Even defenders of the idea today such as Bruno Latour admit that Gaia in the original Greek context is “a figure of violence."
Throughout the book, Sherrell eschews the phrase “climate crisis,” substituting a much more nebulous term: “the Problem.”
Once you see that even those you disagree with most strongly normally have something important to say, debates become dialogues.
Can we excuse the bigotry of a writer whose books are so hip and full of life and infectious that you can’t put them down?
Well, then, why—on Kierkegaard’s view—would anyone choose a life of faith?
It is true that a thin plastic device that displays pixels doesn’t make much of a mess, but then, it is also true that life is messy.
Big data can’t save us from mental distresses and disorders.
For Mark Zuckerberg, the metaverse is personally important, a way to achieve an absolute good through connecting people.
Any attempt to create a monoculture is necessarily self-defeating.
Cognitive wellness culture proposes to curate our attention so that we can better spend it.
Are we willing to undertake the long, slow work of persuasion in a time of the politics of personal destruction?
What we are seeing, then, is a fictional spectacle—a pseudo-iconoclastic event.
The central truths revealed to me by psilocybin were all the things my mother tried to teach me.
Considering the purpose of free speech, from courts to classrooms.
No one works in Rajneeshpuram. They “worship.” Worship includes grading roads, plowing fields, pursuing the many lawsuits brought by Bhagwan in Oregon.
The answer cannot simply come in the form of another list of dos-and-don’ts.
The literature classroom is an unusually fit environment in which to pursue “the deepening and sharpening of emotional powers.”
I remember hearing the news and thinking that this was going to end badly for everyone. I had no idea just how bad things would get.
The language of self-censorship removes the question from the moral realm in which it properly belongs.
The emptiness of words, and our shared resignation to meaning manipulation, is no small matter.
Is it possible to imagine the ballet world without a primary teleology of aesthetic perfectionism and a baseline of low self-worth?
What are the implications for any society that emphasizes monuments to power and domination over imagination and the arts?
What pleasure, what gratification, can we offer to people that exceeds the pleasure of hating?
Camus embodied an existence that was itself conflicted, caught between the vectors of history and lived experience.
I don’t like this collapse of trust; I don’t like being in a technological arms race with my students.
Attentional humility opens us to sympathetic reading—a willingness to receive from the text on the author’s own terms.
Even in a technological age, Albert Borgmann believed we can still have what is real.
Doctors need a medical humanities that does more than just help them see health and disease through a patient’s eyes.
If politics is your life, then you must tell yourself a political story in order to live.
Intellectualism’s core activity is analysis—investigating how and why certain occurrences take place around us.
The times may be captive, but the thinking has to remain free.
In trying to get a little for myself, why must I push someone else down?
The most creative, innovative, and profound MacIntyre was the one who thought about moral rationality.